The debate over the “health care crisis” is amazing. What is even more amazing is stacking the plain meaning of the words up and seeing what you have.

We have heard the constant drumbeat of "every industrialized country other than the US has universal health insurance coverage." If you go to the various countries' news agencies, you learn that, while they have universal coverage, the care is being rationed. While you are covered under the government’s insurance program, you can’t simply schedule an appointment for later this week for an MRI. Instead, the government’s system stacks all of the MRI requests and decides (we still don’t know how) which requests to grant and how to order the others.

Here in U.S., we do not have mandated coverage, but we do have mandated care. You aren’t feeling well? Well, you walk yourself into any hospital in the U.S. and get treated regardless of having medical coverage. This mandated care is required by law.

So citizens of the U.S., do you want to pay more for required coverage despite the fact that your care will be rationed (i.e. might never be received), or would you rather continue paying for required care?

I'll take the required care.

• She's a bigot (one who is strongly partial to one's own group, religion, race, or politics and is intolerant of those who differ)
• She's a racist (a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to rule others).
• She's a sexist (a person with sexist attitudes or behavior).
• She does not believe in the Constitution of the U.S.
• She believes that policies should be made by courts.